Panel of Experts

Karl Schellscheidt

SAT Prep Expert

  • BSE, Princeton University '90
  • M.A., Secondary Education Seton Hall University '93
  • J.D., University of Pennsylvania Law School '00

Fred Hargadon

Dean of Admission

  • Swarthmore College
    (1964-1969)
  • Stanford University
    (1969-1984)
  • Princeton University
    (1988-2003)

Don Betterton

Financial Aid Expert

  • Director of Financial Aid, Princeton University (1973-2006)
  • Certified College Planner
  • Principal, Betterton College Planning

Seamus Malin

Admission Expert

  • Harvard University
    Dir. of Financial Aid
    (1966-1977)
    Asst. Dean of Admission
    (1977-1987)
    International Office Director
    (1987-2002)

SAT Prep Redefined . . . ePrep for the SAT

SAT   ePrep
Karl Schellscheidt - Jun 27, 2007

eprep for the SAT demo

eprep test prep videoAmong other things, like being a father and a coach, I have been an SAT tutor in New Jersey for the past sixteen years. Members of my “Class of 2007″ were recently admitted to schools that include Brown, Columbia, Cornell, Dartmouth, Georgetown, NYU, Princeton, and UPENN. In my last post, I described the positive and negative aspects of traditional SAT prep services. My take on existing SAT prep products and services, in short, goes something like this:

a) Self-Help Books: inexpensive; truly effective for only the most talented and self-motivated students
b) Prep Classes: expensive; instructor quality is hit-or-miss; inconvenient to attend
c) Private Tutors: most expensive option; potential for inexperienced instructor; can be inconvenient
d) Online Courses: affordable; convenient; potentially adaptive; feedback is often written and one-dimensional

Nearly two years ago, I led a team of master teachers through a painstaking review of then-existing SAT preparation products and services. We noted the good, the bad, and the truly ugly. (And trust me, there was a lot of ugly . . . well-intentioned, but ugly nonetheless.) We then pondered ways to do it better, listing the requirements of a truly innovative and industry-changing SAT prep service:

1) METHODOLOGY: The course must employ the practice-grade-review methodology that I have proven to be successful in my private tutoring practice. (I once tutored a girl who scored in the low 500s on the PSAT. During our tutoring sessions, I employed the aforementioned methodology exclusively. She is now a member of Princeton’s Class of 2008.)

2) SIMULATE CONDITIONS: The course must require students to work under simulated condition . . . not deplorable conditions, not perfect conditions, simulated conditions. (About seven years ago I tutored a strong-willed boy who insisted on taking each practice test in complete and utter silence. I watched in amazement as, for six weeks, he nailed each and every practice question. He never managed to break 1250 on a real test, however.)

3) INTUITIVE: The course must do more than merely offer answer explanations; it must show students how to work through SAT problems with the same pencil and same paper they will be asked to work with on test day. (I once borrowed a friend’s digital camera. I could not, however, figure out how to operate the flash feature. Drats. Upon returning the camera, I did not ask my friend to explain how to operate the flash. Instead, I handed him the camera and asked him to “show me” how it functioned. The bottom line is that SAT students learn better, and more efficiently, when problem solving is both explained and demonstrated/modeled in real time.)

4) ADAPT: The course must adapt to each student’s ability level. (Every student should work to attain his/her personal maximum. ePrep for the SAT employs the same proven feedback loop that I use in my private practice. The loop helps each student determine and adjust his/her target scores as appropriate.)

5) EXPERT TEACHER: The course must be taught by a master teacher. (A lot of smart people can explain the five steps required to solve a given algebra problem, for example. The master teacher can go a step further, however. The master teacher knows which of the five steps in most likely to cause problems for students and will address the issue proactively.)

6) CONVENIENT: The course must be accessible to virtually every student.

Now, after nearly two years of development, our ePrep team is ready to deliver what I believe will be the best SAT prep service available online or offline. While we’re currently entering our “Alpha” test of ePrep for the SAT and are not scheduled to launch the full product until later this summer, we encourage you to experience a small morsel of what ePrep for the SAT will deliver. Click on the demo banner, download the brief sample tests, and let the fun begin. Please stay tuned. There is more to come.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks

6 Responses to 'SAT Prep Redefined . . . ePrep for the SAT'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'SAT Prep Redefined . . . ePrep for the SAT'.

  1. June 27th, 2007 at 12:07 pm

    Sam Jackson said,

    You might want to make a side-by-side comparison chart of the ePrep mechanism versus other alternatives, if it meets its promise that could be a very compelling graphic. I’m interested in this approach but the demo didn’t provide as much information into the new methodology as I was hoping for. Still, hope you guys do well! I know I haven’t touched base in a while, but I’m still reading!

  2. June 27th, 2007 at 10:46 pm

    Karl said,

    Thanks, Sam. Your comments, as always, are well received and duly noted. The demo does leave a lot out — remedial links and the feedback loop, among other valuable features. I will provide you with a sneak preview of the development site, as soon as we have another couple of weeks to beat on it. I will be in touch.

  3. July 2nd, 2007 at 8:21 am

    da man said,

    I knew this site was too good to be true…
    Now you want to charge people…. typical

  4. July 2nd, 2007 at 1:17 pm

    Karl said,

    Dear da man,

    Understandably, I think you are mistaken. I started a free blog site in August of 2006 and I will continue to offer the same blog site without charge — no catches, no strings.

    As you may have noticed, ePrep has never accepted ads from outside companies. This means that private/personal funds have made ePrep possible.

    I was recently faced with the choice of (i) shutting down the site, (ii) continuing to run the site with funds earned by allowing test-prep companies (that I do not believe in, by the way) to place ads on the site, or (iii) continuing to run the site with funds earned by offering what many believe to be an above-industry-standard product at a below-industry price.

    Whether you agree or disagree, I am very comfortable with my decision to offer a service at a fair price that will benefit many, many students around the world.

    Thanks for the comment. It has given me the opportunity to state my position. I hope you remain a visitor and continue to submit thoughtful comments.

  5. July 14th, 2007 at 3:06 pm

    Ron Shasta said,

    Tutoring can be expensive, but there are several companies offering unlimited tutoring for under $100 per month and I was wondering if you have any experience with them. I’ve come across a number of online tutoring websites (e.g. tutor.com, homeworkhelp.com, tutoreasy.com, http://www.schooltrainer.com, etc.). Has anyone prepared a comparison of the various companies (pricing, quality, etc.)?

  6. July 16th, 2007 at 9:41 pm

    Karl said,

    Ron,

    To be quite honest, I have never researched or otherwise encountered companies that offer the deal you described. I, therefore, cannot offer first-hand advice. I will say, however, that I think you should research such online tutoring websites before making any kind of purchase.

    Sites that offer the best products and services will offer free samples of their products and/or services before visitors are asked to make a purchase decisions. (A free sample or trial period is a sign that the company believes in its product or service.) I would not be quick to trust a site that does not offer a free sample or trial period.

Leave a Reply